Table of Contents
At SquaredTech, we understand the growing demand for compact and versatile action cameras that suit not only extreme sports enthusiasts but also travelers, families, and everyday content creators. In 2025, two models stand out in this category: the DJI Osmo Nano and the Insta360 Go Ultra. Both launched recently on September 23 and August 21, respectively—and pack impressive features into tiny frames weighing just over 50 grams each.
These cameras are designed with a modular two-part system: a small magnetic camera unit combined with a dock or pod that includes a touchscreen for controls, playback, and charging. While their weights are similar, their designs differ, the Osmo Nano adopts a longer, more rectangular shape, whereas the Go Ultra is squarer and thinner. Beyond the specs, real-world usability, performance, and accessory options define their appeal. This comprehensive analysis from our editorial team will help you decide which is the right compact action camera for your needs.
Read More About Our Article of DJI Osmo Nano Review: Can DJI’s Tiny Action Camera Beat Insta360’s Go Ultra? published on September 23rd, 2025 at SquareTech
Design and Ruggedness: How Do They Stand Up?
Both the DJI Osmo Nano and Insta360 Go Ultra prioritize portability and durability. Each camera is waterproof to depths of 10 meters (33 feet), making them suitable for underwater or wet-environment filming. Individually, the camera modules weigh under 55 grams, with the Osmo Nano camera at about 52 grams and the Go Ultra at 53 grams.
When paired with their docks, the weight increases: the Osmo Nano with its “Multifunctional Vision Dock” totals 124 grams, and the Go Ultra plus its “Action Pod” weighs 161 grams. While heavier, these docks provide essential functionalities like remote control through OLED HD touchscreens, file transfer capabilities, and extra battery life.
In terms of design, the Osmo Nano’s oblong camera firmly attaches with clips and magnets for easy mounting on hats, lanyards, or flat surfaces. The dock offers convenient physical record buttons and display. The Insta360 Go Ultra’s action pod has a larger, flip-up 2.5-inch screen that resembles a mirrorless camera, catering to users who want real-time image framing without resorting to smartphone apps. Its magnetic connection allows the camera to detach and be worn or mounted discreetly.
Both docks have IPX4 splash protection but are not fully submersible, emphasizing that while the cameras themselves go underwater, the docks should stay dry. Each lens includes a replaceable protector, reducing the cost and inconvenience of accidental damage.
In everyday use, the Osmo Nano dock’s top-heavy design can cause it to topple on uneven surfaces. Conversely, the Go Ultra’s pod stays upright on irregular supports like tree trunks or walls, aided by a slightly pull-out screen that acts as a tripod stand. Alone, the Osmo Nano camera can stand on its own flat base, but the smaller Go Ultra camera does not.
Our conclusion is that these design factors balance out to a draw, with each camera suited to slightly different mounting and usage preferences.
Performance and Usability: Storage, Screens, and Battery Life
A critical decision point between the DJI Osmo Nano and Insta360 Go Ultra is in how they manage storage and user control. The Osmo Nano offers built-in internal storage with options of 64GB or 128GB, expandable further with microSD cards supporting up to 1TB. The microSD card is actually housed in the dock rather than the camera itself. In comparison, the Go Ultra relies solely on microSD cards, supporting up to 2TB capacity, ideal for creators who shoot vast amounts of 4K footage without frequent transfers.
The touchscreen size favors the Go Ultra, which boasts a 2.5-inch display, approximately 25% larger than the Osmo Nano’s 1.96-inch screen. This added screen space is valuable for framing shots and checking playback, especially without needing a connected smartphone. However, Squaredtech notes that the Osmo Nano’s smaller screen can be harder to read in bright conditions.
Both cameras support hands-free operation with gesture and voice controls. The Osmo Nano responds to taps and voice commands, while the Go Ultra includes gestures like a thumbs-up. These features work reliably, especially in noisy outdoor settings.
Battery endurance favors the Osmo Nano, delivering about 85 minutes of continuous video at 1080p/24fps, compared to roughly 60 minutes for the Go Ultra. However, the Go Ultra compensates with rapid charging, reaching 80% battery in just 12 minutes versus the Osmo Nano’s 20 minutes. For users needing quick turnaround, the Go Ultra’s fast charging reduces downtime despite shorter battery life.
User experience-wise, the Go Ultra stands out as more beginner-friendly. It features helpful on-screen tutorials to ease new users into camera functions, whereas the Osmo Nano’s interface, while streamlined and professional, may require more time to master due to fewer automatic guides.
We rate the Insta360 Go Ultra slightly ahead for performance and usability, recommending it especially for users new to compact action cameras or those prioritizing ease of use.
Image and Video Quality: Sensor Size, Resolution, and Color Profiles
A focal point for discerning content creators is image quality. The Insta360 Go Ultra uses a 1/1.28-inch CMOS sensor capable of shooting 50-megapixel photos, while the DJI Osmo Nano offers a slightly smaller 1/1.3-inch sensor with 35-megapixel photos. The Go Ultra also boasts a higher video bitrate of 180 Mbps compared to 120 Mbps for the Osmo Nano, suggesting improved video clarity on paper.
Real-world testing reveals nuanced differences. The Go Ultra tends toward brighter footage with lighter sky exposure and precise face rendering, traits optimized for immediate social sharing. Meanwhile, the Osmo Nano produces slightly darker clips with a tonal range designed for post-processing, catering to more advanced video editors who wish to fine-tune color and contrast.
Both cameras perform well in changing light conditions, such as moving from shadow to sunlight, with skin tones remaining natural and backgrounds well balanced. Night modes are practical on both, though the Osmo Nano’s dynamic range offers a slight edge for low-light detail retention.
Color accuracy is strong on both units, and users can manually adjust white balance. Stabilization during motion, whether walking or running, remains excellent for both models.
Notably, the Osmo Nano supports advanced color profiles, including 10-bit color depth and DJI’s D-Log M profile, which delivers four times the color information of 8-bit footage. This feature is a major advantage for professional-level color grading and matching footage across multi-camera projects.
We evaluate image quality as evenly matched, with distinctions largely based on user needs whether for quick sharing or in-depth editing.
Audio Capabilities: Recording Quality and Microphone Integration
Sound quality is another area where the DJI Osmo Nano and Insta360 Go Ultra differ subtly yet significantly. The Go Ultra records at 48 kHz with 32-bit depth in AAC format, offering four audio modes including automatic wind noise reduction, stereo recording, and voice enhancement tailor-made for vlogging contexts. The Osmo Nano records at 48 kHz and 16-bit depth with two built-in microphones for stereo audio capture.
Despite the Go Ultra’s theoretically higher bit depth, practical testing shows both cameras deliver clean, clear speech recording indoors and in windless outdoor settings. Both units effectively reduce wind noise, though higher noise reduction settings soften other ambient sounds too much, affecting natural audio fidelity.
For creators who require professional-quality sound, attaching external microphones is recommended. The Go Ultra supports Bluetooth headphones like AirPods Pro 2 and DJ’s microphones, while the Osmo Nano can pair directly with up to two DJI Mic transmitters without additional receivers, which is convenient for users already invested in the DJI ecosystem.
We find the DJI Osmo Nano slightly superior in audio clarity and speaker versatility, making it the preferred choice for creators who prioritize sound.
Editing Apps and Software: Turning Footage into Stories
Both cameras feature companion mobile and desktop apps to review, edit, and share content. These apps are crucial in transforming raw footage into engaging videos.
The Insta360 app excels at AI-assisted editing, automatically generating polished videos with transitions, music, and highlights from user clips. Its lively interface also includes tutorials and inspiration tabs that help beginners and busy users create share-ready content with minimal effort. Manual editing options are available for those who wish to customize further.
In contrast, DJI’s Mimo app targets more experienced users seeking manual control over post-production. It offers one-tap editing for quick results and advanced tools like color recovery for precise grading. The visual tone of the app is darker and more subdued, reflecting its pro-oriented design philosophy. Though powerful, it has a steeper learning curve compared to Insta360.
We consider both apps intuitive and capable, resulting in a draw. The recommendation depends on whether a creator values user-friendly AI tools or desires detailed control over editing.
Conclusion: Which Camera Should You Choose?
| Feature | DJI Osmo Nano | Insta360 Go Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | 1.96 inches OLED, 314×556 resolution, 800 cd/㎡ brightness | 2.5 inches flip touchscreen (Action Pod) |
| Microphones | Two built-in microphones | One built-in microphone |
| Weight | 52 g (Camera), 72 g (Vision Dock) | 52.9 g (Camera), 108.5 g (Action Pod) |
| Dimensions (Camera) | 57.3×29.5×28 mm | 46×45.7×18.3 mm |
| Dimensions (Dock/Pod) | 59.1×42.2×22.3 mm | 70.4×48.8×33.3 mm (folded) |
| Sensor | 1/1.3-inch CMOS | 1/1.28-inch CMOS |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.85 |
| ISO Range | 100-25600 | 100-6400 |
| Field of View (FOV) | 143° | 156° (14.27 mm lens) |
| Photo Resolution | 35 MP (6880×5160) | Up to 50 MP (8192×6144) |
| Video Resolution | 4K (3840×2160) @60fps, 4K@120fps slow motion | 4K @60fps, 2.7K, 1080p slow motion |
| Video Bitrate | 120 Mbps | 180 Mbps |
| Video Codec | H.265 | H.264/H.265 |
| Log Profile | 10-bit D-Log M supported | Not supported |
| Video Format | MP4 (H.265) | MP4 (H.264/H.265) |
| Audio Recording | 48 kHz, 16-bit AAC stereo | 48 kHz, 32-bit AAC |
| Stabilization | RockSteady 3.0, Horizon Balancing | FlowState Stabilization, 360º horizon lock |
| Waterproof | 10 m (camera), IPX4 splash (dock) | 10 m (camera), IPX4 splash (pod) |
| Battery | 530 mAh (camera), 1300 mAh (dock) | 500 mAh (camera), 1450 mAh (pod) |
| Operating Time | 90 mins (camera), 200 mins (with dock) | 70 mins (camera), 200 mins (with pod) |
| Charge Time | 15 mins to 80% (dock), 60 mins full | 12 mins to 80% (camera), 20 mins full |
| Storage | Built-in 64GB/128GB, microSD up to 1TB | microSD up to 2TB |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/n/ac/ax) |
| Bluetooth | BLE 5.1 | BLE 5.4 |
| Ports | USB-C 3.1 | USB-C 2.0 |
| App Support | DJI Mimo | Insta360 App |
| Pre-recording Modes | 5/10/15/30 seconds; 1/2/5 minutes | Not supported |
This comparison table highlights key specifications, features, and usability distinctions between the DJI Osmo Nano and Insta360 Go Ultra, aiding in informed decision-making for 2025 content creators seeking ultra-compact action cameras.
After thorough testing and analysis at Squaredtech, both the DJI Osmo Nano and Insta360 Go Ultra stand as excellent compact action cameras that cater to different user priorities. The Osmo Nano shines with its professional color profiles, integrated storage, audio clarity, and solid image quality for creators with more advanced workflows. It offers a smaller, streamlined design and strong DJI ecosystem integration.
Meanwhile, the Go Ultra appeals to those seeking an accessible, beginner-friendly experience with robust AI editing, a larger touchscreen, faster charging, and a broad accessory range. It is versatile for families and hobbyists who want high-quality footage with minimal hassle.
Pricing also plays a role: the Osmo Nano is significantly more affordable, making it a compelling choice if budget is a key concern.
Ultimately, SquaredTech advises that your decision should be guided by how you intend to shoot, your editing preferences, and which system aligns best with your creative goals. Both cameras deliver stable, sharp footage in a wearable form factor, pushing the boundaries of compact action cams in 2025.
Stay Updated: Gadgets
